crime+scene+script

media type="custom" key="4717295"

My name is Detective Kollmar. Two weeks ago I was called to a crime scene at a beach house whit a two bed room one bathroom house. The alleged victim was Felix a man with no parents and inherited all of their money when they died. Also, he was not well liked. Another is that his frends did not like him they just pretended becaues they were on his will. The suspect guilty of committing this crime is Kendra she killed him for his money. This suspect's guilt was confirmed through the testing and results of evidence collected at the crime scene.

The most incriminating piece of evidence was the finger prints on felixses cup. The evidence was found on Felixs cupwith pop on it. The test performed was the fingerprints on plastic test. The results of the test were that there was felixses fingerprints and also Kendras. This connects the suspect to the crime because there was posin in the ice and Felix whod not do it to him self.

The next piece of evidence collected was the secret not. It was found on the floor near the victom. The test performed was the secret note tst. The results of the test were that it was Kendras hand righting but she put that Vera did it. This connects the suspect to the crime because it sead dear Martha im so glad its over Felix is dead senserly Vera.

Another piece of evidence collected was the powder on the ice tray. It was found on the ice tray nery the garbeg can. The test performed was the powder test. The results of the test were the powder on the icecube tray was found also on Kendras shoe. This connects the suspect to the crime because the ice had poison in it so she had the powder on the icecube tray and she was the one to touth Felixses cup exespt for felix. (How do you know the ice had poison in it?Discuss the test you used.))

The last piece of evidence collected was the poison in the icecubes.. It was found in Felixses cup. The test performed was the ice cube test. The results of the test were that there was poison in the ice cubes. This connects the suspect to the crime because it was a poison to kill him and there was no cuts on him. (Repeat of evidence.)

According to the evidence,it was kengra she blamed vera with the note also she poisoned him and blamed vera.

Therefore, Kendra committed the crime of piosoning felix for his money.

**Rubric for Podcasts** introduction. Provides relevant information and establishes a clear purpose engaging the listener immediately. || **__Describes the topic and engages the audience as the introduction proceeds.__** || Somewhat engaging (covers well-known topic), and provides a vague purpose. || Irrelevant or inappropriate topic that minimally engages listener. Does not include an introduction or the purpose is vague and unclear. ||^  || 68% ||
 * ** CATEGORY ** || ** Exemplary **  || ** Proficient **  || ** Partially Proficient **  || ** Incomplete **  || ** POINTS **  ||
 * ** Introduction ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || Catchy and clever
 * ^  || **__Tells who is speaking, date the podcast was produced, and where the speaker is located.__**  || Tells most of the following: who is speaking, date of the podcast, and location of speaker.  || Alludes to who is speaking, date of the podcast, and location of speaker.  || Speaker is not identified. No production date or location of the speaker is provided.  ||^   ||
 * ** Content ** || ** 6 points ** || ** 4 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || The motive was detailed and clearly based on information delivered throughout the investigation.  || **__The motive is detailed and based on partial information delivered throughout the investigation.__**  || The motive is not very detailed and is sprinkled with inaccurate information.  || The motive is missing, or unclear or all information is inaccurate.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || Four pieces of strong evidence were presented and linked to the suspect in an organized, methodical manner.  || Three or four pieces of evidence were presented and/or linked to the suspect in a somewhat organized, thoughtful manner.  || **__ Two pieces of shaky evidence were presented and/or loosely linked to the suspect. Lack of organization.  __** || One to no pieces of unimportant evidence were presented in an unorganized manner.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || The events in the scenario are detailed, extremely organized and strongly supported with evidence and facts related to the crime scene.  || The events in the scenario are well organized, somewhat detailed, and supported with evidence from the crime scene. || **__The events in the crime scene lack organization, detail, and are weakly supported with evidence from the crime scene.__** || There was no clear direction and evidence was unimportant. ||^   ||
 * ^  || Conclusion clearly summarizes key information.  || Conclusion summarizes information.  || **__ Conclusion vaguely summarizes key information  __** || No conclusion is provided.  ||^   ||
 * ** Delivery ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 point ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || Well rehearsed, smooth delivery in a conversational style.  || **__Rehearsed, smooth delivery.__**  || Appears unrehearsed with uneven delivery.  || Delivery is hesitant, and choppy and sounds like the presenter is reading.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || Highly effective enunciation and presenter's speech is clear and intelligible, not distant and muddled. Expression, and rhythm keep the audience listening. || **__Enunciation, expression, pacing are effective throughout the podcast.__**  || Enunciation, expression, rhythm are sometimes distracting during the podcast.  || Enunciation of spoken word is distant and muddled and not clear. Expression and rhythm are distracting throughout the podcast.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || Correct grammar is used throughout the podcast.  || **__ Correct grammar is used during most of the podcast.  __** || Occasionally incorrect grammar is used during the podcast.  || Poor grammar is used throughout the podcast.  ||^   ||
 * ** Graphic and Music Enhancements ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || **__Music enhances the mood, quality, and understanding of the presentation.__**  || Music provides supportive background to the podcast.  || Music provides somewhat distracting background to the podcast.  || Music is distracting to presentation.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__ All music enhancements are owned by the creator of the podcast or copyright cleared with appropriate documentation.  __** || Music enhancements are owned by the creator of the podcast or copyright cleared.  || Use of copyrighted works is questionable.  || Copyright infringement is obvious.  ||^   ||
 * ** Technical Production ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || **__ Presentation is recorded in a quiet environment without background noise and distractions.  __** || Presentation is recorded in a quiet environment with minimal background noise and distractions.  || Presentation is recorded in a semi-quiet environment with some background noise and distractions.  || Presentation is recorded in a noisy environment with constant background noise and distractions.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__Transitions are smooth and spaced correctly without noisy, dead space.__**  || Transitions are smooth with a minimal amount of ambient noise.  || Transitions are uneven with inconsistent spacing; ambient noise is present.  || Transitions are abrupt and background noise needs to be filtered.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__ Volume of voice, music, and effects enhance the presentation.  __** || Volume is acceptable.  || Volume is occasionally inconsistent.  || Volume changes are highly distracting.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__ Podcast length keeps the audience interested and engaged.  __** || Podcast length keeps audience listening.  || Podcast length is somewhat long or somewhat short to keep audience engaged.  || Podcast is either too long or too short to keep the audience engaged.  ||^   ||
 * ** TOTAL POINTS ** || 39/57